Vd: Difference between revisions

From ACD Percepta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added Vd description and link to poster)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
===Overview===
<br />
 
This module provides mechanistic predictions of the apprent volume of distribution at steady-state in humans. The predictive model is based on Oie-Tozer pharmacokinetic equation that accounts for the extent of drug binding in both plasma and tissues. Calculations therefore use octanol/water logP (the major determinant of tissue binding) and unbound fraction in plasma (''f''<sub>u, plasma</sub>) as customizable input parameters.
 
===Module Interface===


This module contains a predictive algorithm that generates a quantitative estimate of the apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd) of a compound. Physicochemical parameters, charge state, lipophilicity and hydrogen bonding capacity are automatically computed and used as inputs to the predictive model of the volume of distribution.<br />
[[Image:Distribution_Vd.png|center]]


===Features===
<ol>
* Calculates the extent of tissue binding of candidate compounds expressed as Vd values and displays a comment regarding the effect of physicochemical properties (LogP and ionization) on drug distribution in the body.
<li> logP and fraction unbound in plasma (''f''<sub>u, plasma</sub>) are calculated automatically. Alter these values to simulate the limiting effect of the compound's lipophilicity and/or plasma protein binding on its tissue disposition. [[Image:Distribution_Vd_Simulation.png|right]]
* Experimentally measured volume of distribution is displayed for up to 5 similar structures from the training set along with the corresponding literature references.
<br />


== Interface ==
:a. Click the "Undo" button to restore the automatically calculated property value (''f''<sub>u, plasma</sub> in the current example) for a compound and recalculate Vd using default parameter values
<br />


[[Image:Distribution_Vd.png|center]]
:b. Click to recalculate Vd using the currently specified parameter values
<br />


# Calculated apparent volume of distribution of a compound:<br>[[File:Distribution_vd_scale.png|300px]]
</li>
# A general estimate of likely volume of distribution for compounds of this type, based on chemical structure and physicochemical properties
<li> Calculated apparent volume of distribution of a compound:<br>[[File:Distribution_vd_scale.png|300px]]</li>
# Up to 5 similar structures in the training set with experimental quantitative values of apparent volume of distribution and literature references
<li> Up to 5 most similar structures from the training set with experimental Vd values and references</li>
<br />
</ol>




<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
<div class="mw-collapsible">


==Technical information==
==Technical information==
Line 34: Line 33:
* %PPB values represent the overall fraction of drug bound in human plasma, i.e. accounts for interactions with different proteins: albumin, alpha<sub>1</sub>-acid glycoprotein, lipoproteins, SHBG, transcortin etc. ''In vitro'' measurements of the extent of plasma protein binding usually involve equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation methods.
* %PPB values represent the overall fraction of drug bound in human plasma, i.e. accounts for interactions with different proteins: albumin, alpha<sub>1</sub>-acid glycoprotein, lipoproteins, SHBG, transcortin etc. ''In vitro'' measurements of the extent of plasma protein binding usually involve equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation methods.
%PPB = (1 – ''f<sub>u</sub>'') * 100% where ''f<sub>u</sub>'' is fraction of free (unbound) drug in plasma ranging from 0 to 1.
%PPB = (1 – ''f<sub>u</sub>'') * 100% where ''f<sub>u</sub>'' is fraction of free (unbound) drug in plasma ranging from 0 to 1.
* Supplementary Distribution\Vd module calculates apparent Volume of Distribution of drugs in human body expressed in liters per kg body weight (L/kg).
* Distribution\Vd module calculates apparent Volume of Distribution of drugs in human body expressed in liters per kg body weight (L/kg).


===Experimental data===
===Experimental data===
Experimental data that were utilized to build predictive models were collected from drug prescription information, reference pharmacokinetic tabulations and many original articles. The main sources of Vd data were well-known pharmacokinetic books: "Therapeutic Drugs" (ed. by C. dollery), and Goodman & Gilman's "The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics", while albumin affinity constants were collected mainly from original articles by Valko K. et al. ''J Pharm Sci.'' '''2003''';92(11):2236-48. [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/104556357/abstract], and Kratochwil N.A. et al. ''Biochem Pharmacol.'' '''2002''';64(9):1355-74. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T4P-461XRMC-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=290e081e0775f2be854e4e503160ba2a]
Experimental data that were utilized to build predictive models were collected from drug prescription information, reference pharmacokinetic tabulations and many original articles. The main sources of Vd data were well-known pharmacokinetic books: "Therapeutic Drugs" (ed. by C. dollery), and Goodman & Gilman's "The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics", while albumin affinity constants were collected mainly from original articles by Valko K. et al. ''J Pharm Sci.'' '''2003''';92(11):2236-48. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14603509], and Kratochwil N.A. et al. ''Biochem Pharmacol.'' '''2002''';64(9):1355-74. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12392818]
The compiled data sets contain %PPB data for almost 1500 compounds, about 340 albumin affinity constants and almost 800 Vd values.
The compiled data sets contain %PPB data for almost 1500 compounds, about 340 albumin affinity constants and almost 800 Vd values.


===Model development (technical details)===
===Model development (technical details)===
The models for predicting %PPB and log ''K<sub>a</sub><sup>HSA</sup>'' constants were developed with Algorithm Builder using a novel methodology consisting of two parts:
* Global baseline statistical model employing binomial PLS with multiple bootstrapping using a predefined set of fragmental descriptors.
* Local correction to baseline prediction based on analysis of experimental data for similar compounds.
The underlying methodology enables obtaining an intrinsic evaluation of prediction confidence by the means of Reliability Index (RI) values calculated for each prediction. RI ranging from 0 to 1 serves as an indication whether a submitted compound falls within the Model Applicability Domain. Two criteria influence the calculation od Reliability Index of a prediction:
* Similarity of the analyzed molecule to compounds in the Self-training Library (prediction is unreliable if no similar compounds have been found in the Library).
* Consistency of experimental data for similar compounds – reliability of calculated values is lower is data for similar compounds are discrepant.


Both %PPB and log ''K<sub>a</sub><sup>HSA</sup>'' predictive models are '''Trainable''' meaning that their Applicability Domains may be easily extended by addition of ‘in-house’ experimental data to the module Self-training Library. Notably, the baseline statistical model does not need to be rebuilt from scratch to account for data entered by the user. The model is retrained automatically as new compounds are added to the Library. Model trainability would be particularly useful for predicting serum albumin affinity constants as literature data sets are very sparse, thus the ability to take advantage of large ‘in-house’ libraries gives the potential for a significant improvement of both accuracy and reliability of calculations.
The predictive models of %PPB and log ''K<sub>a</sub><sup>HSA</sup>'' were derived using GALAS (Global, Adjusted Locally According to Similarity) modeling methodology (please refer to [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20373217] for more details).
 
Each GALAS model consists of two parts:
* Global (baseline) statistical model that reflects general trends in the variation of the property of interest.
* Similarity-based routine that performs local correction of baseline predictions taking into account the differences between baseline and experimental values for the most similar training set compounds.
<br>
GALAS methodology also provides the basis for estimating reliability of predictions by the means of calculated Reliability Index (''RI'') value that takes into account:
* Similarity of tested compound to the training set molecules.
* Consistence of experimental values and baseline model prediction for the most similar similar compounds from the training set.
 
Reliability Index ranges from 0 to 1 (0 corresponds to a completely unreliable, and 1 - a highly reliable prediction) and serves as an indication whether a submitted compound falls within the Model Applicability Domain. Compounds obtaining predictions ''RI'' < 0.3 are considered outside of the Applicability Domain of the model.
 
Both %PPB and log ''K<sub>a</sub><sup>HSA</sup>'' are '''Trainable''' meaning that their Applicability Domains may be easily extended by addition of ‘in-house’ experimental data to the module Self-training Library. Notably, the baseline statistical model does not need to be rebuilt from scratch to account for data entered by the user. The model is retrained automatically as new compounds are added to the Library. Model trainability would be particularly useful for predicting serum albumin affinity constants as literature data sets are very sparse, thus the ability to take advantage of large ‘in-house’ libraries gives the potential for a significant improvement of both accuracy and reliability of calculations.
 
Volume of Distribution uses a mechanistic model based on physiological Øie-Tozer equation that relates Vd to the fraction unbound in plasma (calculated using %PPB model described above) and fraction unbound in tissues (calculated by a non-linear ionization-specific model in terms of LogP and pKa). For more technical details about %PPB and Vd models please refer to [http://perceptahelp.acdlabs.com/docs/Distribution.pdf].
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 08:40, 20 October 2022

Overview

This module provides mechanistic predictions of the apprent volume of distribution at steady-state in humans. The predictive model is based on Oie-Tozer pharmacokinetic equation that accounts for the extent of drug binding in both plasma and tissues. Calculations therefore use octanol/water logP (the major determinant of tissue binding) and unbound fraction in plasma (fu, plasma) as customizable input parameters.

Module Interface

Distribution Vd.png
  1. logP and fraction unbound in plasma (fu, plasma) are calculated automatically. Alter these values to simulate the limiting effect of the compound's lipophilicity and/or plasma protein binding on its tissue disposition.
    Distribution Vd Simulation.png
    a. Click the "Undo" button to restore the automatically calculated property value (fu, plasma in the current example) for a compound and recalculate Vd using default parameter values
    b. Click to recalculate Vd using the currently specified parameter values
  2. Calculated apparent volume of distribution of a compound:
    Distribution vd scale.png
  3. Up to 5 most similar structures from the training set with experimental Vd values and references


Technical information


Calculated quantitative parameters

Parameters calculated by Distribution\Protein Binding module include percentage plasma protein binding values (%PPB) and log KaHSA constants. These properties are related, but characterize provide slightly different information about the considered process.

  • log KaHSA represents the drug’s affinity constant to human serum albumin – the major carrier protein in plasma. Experimental data come from direct chromatographic determination of binding strength to that particular protein.

log KaHSA = log ([LA]/([L][A])) where [LA] is concentration of ligand bound to albumin, [L] – that of free ligand, and [A] – concentration of free albumin which is estimated at ~0.6 mM in human plasma.

  • %PPB values represent the overall fraction of drug bound in human plasma, i.e. accounts for interactions with different proteins: albumin, alpha1-acid glycoprotein, lipoproteins, SHBG, transcortin etc. In vitro measurements of the extent of plasma protein binding usually involve equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation methods.

%PPB = (1 – fu) * 100% where fu is fraction of free (unbound) drug in plasma ranging from 0 to 1.

  • Distribution\Vd module calculates apparent Volume of Distribution of drugs in human body expressed in liters per kg body weight (L/kg).

Experimental data

Experimental data that were utilized to build predictive models were collected from drug prescription information, reference pharmacokinetic tabulations and many original articles. The main sources of Vd data were well-known pharmacokinetic books: "Therapeutic Drugs" (ed. by C. dollery), and Goodman & Gilman's "The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics", while albumin affinity constants were collected mainly from original articles by Valko K. et al. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92(11):2236-48. [1], and Kratochwil N.A. et al. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002;64(9):1355-74. [2] The compiled data sets contain %PPB data for almost 1500 compounds, about 340 albumin affinity constants and almost 800 Vd values.

Model development (technical details)

The predictive models of %PPB and log KaHSA were derived using GALAS (Global, Adjusted Locally According to Similarity) modeling methodology (please refer to [3] for more details).

Each GALAS model consists of two parts:

  • Global (baseline) statistical model that reflects general trends in the variation of the property of interest.
  • Similarity-based routine that performs local correction of baseline predictions taking into account the differences between baseline and experimental values for the most similar training set compounds.


GALAS methodology also provides the basis for estimating reliability of predictions by the means of calculated Reliability Index (RI) value that takes into account:

  • Similarity of tested compound to the training set molecules.
  • Consistence of experimental values and baseline model prediction for the most similar similar compounds from the training set.

Reliability Index ranges from 0 to 1 (0 corresponds to a completely unreliable, and 1 - a highly reliable prediction) and serves as an indication whether a submitted compound falls within the Model Applicability Domain. Compounds obtaining predictions RI < 0.3 are considered outside of the Applicability Domain of the model.

Both %PPB and log KaHSA are Trainable meaning that their Applicability Domains may be easily extended by addition of ‘in-house’ experimental data to the module Self-training Library. Notably, the baseline statistical model does not need to be rebuilt from scratch to account for data entered by the user. The model is retrained automatically as new compounds are added to the Library. Model trainability would be particularly useful for predicting serum albumin affinity constants as literature data sets are very sparse, thus the ability to take advantage of large ‘in-house’ libraries gives the potential for a significant improvement of both accuracy and reliability of calculations.

Volume of Distribution uses a mechanistic model based on physiological Øie-Tozer equation that relates Vd to the fraction unbound in plasma (calculated using %PPB model described above) and fraction unbound in tissues (calculated by a non-linear ionization-specific model in terms of LogP and pKa). For more technical details about %PPB and Vd models please refer to [4].